It all adds up, and you have to keep on top of all of it to be successful. These on-the-fly tactics are made all the more necessary by AA's emergent elements-randomly selected objectives and sub-objectives an opponent of varying power and ability a change in approach necessitated by both the company you choose to enter a conflict with and its veterancy level.
And it will be repeatedly, because Ardennes Assault's emphasis on persistence means a loss isn't game over, it's a 'try again with weakened forces'. You're expected to make good use of your surroundings and make tactical decisions on the fly, or you will end up with your backside being handed to you repeatedly. On the battlefield it's pretty much Company of Heroes as you know and love it-intense, harrowing real-time strategy with an emphasis on small squads and tactics over tank rushes and superweapons. But all the same, you can operate a distinctly Stalinist approach to war and send unfathomable numbers of young men into the grinder. In short, you want to keep your troops alive as long as possible-the more combat they see, the better they are. War isn't sensible, though.Īs well as manually selected upgrades, units can gain ability through veterancy. Focusing on just one company's power is viable, but striking a balance is obviously the far more sensible option. Each has its own skill tree to upgrade as you choose-make the paratroopers cheaper to call in, or have your aerial bombardment arrive a bit faster, for example.
The fact you're playing this wider game of cat-and-mouse on the meta-map before you've even jumped into the main game, while not a new idea, gives valuable context to battles, and creates a sense of ebb and flow across a vast conflict. Frankly, that's fantastic and I'm delighted to see Relic-one of the few big-name developers still making real-time strategy games on a grand scale-upping the strategy quota rather than watering it down for the mass market.
0 kommentar(er)
